Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Vaccines: Good or Bad?

NOTE: The following is a multi part series, which we have chosen to post as a single offering. In the event that the noted author should publish additional ‘chapters’ in his well researched topic, we shall endeavor to make them available to our readers. Be prepared – THIS is a study… J.B.

When I was growing up I actually believed that the FDA was doing what it was designed to do, make sure the foods we eat are properly labeled, there was no bad things allowed in the food. I’m sure that when they first began that they did just that. But as I grew up people began telling me about the chemicals that they allowed to be put on our food and in our food and for many years I refused to believe that our government would allow that to happen. Then my eyes were opened.

When you see people in the fields with literal hazmat suits on spraying our foods, that bubble burst. The more I researched the more I saw that the FDA, EPA, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Education and the list goes on and on, did very little for the American people. Case in point, the Department of Energy was formed in 1977 under Jimmy Carter for the purpose of making America energy independent, a very good idea. At that time we were importing about 20% of the oil we consume. Today, forty years later, that department has a budget of around $26 billion and we import about 70% of the oil we consume. We have the oil we need.

Our reserves exceed Saudi Arabia’s and Russia’s:

The US holds more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia and Russia, the first time it has surpassed those held by the world’s biggest exporting nations, according to a new study.

Rystad Energy estimates recoverable oil in the US from existing fields, discoveries and yet undiscovered areas amounts to 264bn barrels. The figure surpasses Saudi Arabia’s 212bn and Russia’s 256bn in reserves.

The analysis of 60,000 fields worldwide, conducted over a three-year period by the Oslo-based group, shows total global oil reserves at 2.1tn barrels. This is 70 times the current production rate of about 30bn barrels of crude oil a year, Rystad Energy said on Monday.

One has to ask if we have more oil than them why are we not accessing it. It was George H. W. Bush that locked up ANWAR. The other question that should be asked is, what are they spending $26 billion on?

We see these types of things in virtually every government agency. The EPA is supposed to help our environment clean and free of harmful chemicals but they are allowing what is known as Agent Orange to be sprayed on our crops and Genetically Modified Organisms to contain Agent Orange.

The Environmental Protection Agency has refused a petition that aimed to ban the sale of a powerful pesticide linked with cancer — and while already available, a surge in sales is expected as scientists ready a new crop resistant to the chemical.

Not only has the EPA rejected a petition that sought to prohibit the domestic sale of the dangerous 2,4-D pesticide — a key ingredient in Agent Orange — but the main manufacturer of the chemical predicts that sales will skyrocket in the coming months. The reason, it would seem, is that Dow Chemicals is awaiting federal approval of a genetically engineered crop they’ve created that will be resistant to 2,4-D.

If approved, farmers will be able to plant the frankencrop corn variant and douse their fields with the pesticide to eliminate unwanted weeds with greater success. Although 2,4-D isn’t currently used to a large degree on corn fields, all that could soon change for the country’s most successful crop. Opponents argue, though, that the potential side effects of the pesticide are enough to push for a ban on 2,4-D altogether.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental watch group, has argued that expose to 2,4-D has caused in some cases cancer, hormone disruption, genetic mutations and neurotoxicity, reports the New York Times. In voting not to hear the petition against the pesticide, however, the EPA says that they believe there to be a lack of evidence that would be significant enough to raise suspicion.

That was the chemical that ruined the health of so many of our troops in Viet Nam not to mention the people of Viet Nam. My brother died from being exposed to it when he was a ‘dirt sailor’ in Viet Nam in the late 60’s. I’ve talked to many Viet Nam vets today that have had their health seriously compromised by exposure to Agent Orange. It is the main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup. Virtually all GMO products are engineered to withstand exposure to Roundup.

It is a health hazard that hasn’t come fully to the attention of the public yet simply because Main Stream Media refuses to report on it. The GMO mass experiment on the public is producing results—terrifying ones. GM toxic elements can be found in nearly all pregnant women and children. (Update of the article featured in Genetic Roulette movie.)

The toxins designed into genetically modified crops are finding their way into the bloodstreams of all pregnant women and their fetuses. This shocking result belies the genetic modification industry’s claims that such toxins are destroyed by the digestive tracts of people who eat the animals fed these GMO crops. Obviously, that claim was based on nothing.

(If you’ve seen reports claiming less than 100% are affected, it’s because they picked up the wrong figures from the study, as shown below.)

The Study and Results:

The study, “Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec”, was published in the journal Reproductive Toxicology. The authors, Aziz Aris and Samuel Leblanc, examined the blood of 30 pregnant women and 39 nonpregnant women. All births associated with the study were considered normal; babies were at normal birth weights and considered healthy.

The authors looked for:

* Glyphosate, brand name Roundup

* Gluphosinate, a broad-spectrum herbicide

* AMPA, aminomethyl phosphoric acid, a metabolite of glyphosate

* 3-MMPA, 3-methylphosphinico propionic acid, a metabolite of gluphosinate

* Cry1Ab, the Bt toxin of gluphosinate

Interestingly, both glyphosate and gluphosinate were found in large percentages of nonpregnant women, but neither was found in pregnant women or their fetuses. Obviously, a metabolic change occurs when a woman becomes pregnant. One might have hoped that would be adequate to prevent the toxic effects of GMO feed crops. Unfortunately, it appears that the opposite occurs with Bt corn metabolites, though no toxins from gluphosate were found.

This initial report is an example of the ‘fake news’ concerning the dangers of glyphosate. When you read the entire article you will see the true results, the results that the EPA simply ignores.

The reason I mention all of this is to show a pattern in our present government. That pattern is money will by anything and there really is a plan behind their insanity. This series of articles will only scratch the surface of what we are facing but I want you to be aware of what is going on behind the scenes. John Kennedy stated on October 28, 1963 “There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.” Seven days later he was assassinated.

We can’t just lay down and let government do what it wants. We are here because we stopped paying attention. It will be difficult to stop but we have to stand. Our kid’s future is at stake. We have to try.

Part 2: Are Vaccines a “Good Thing?”

My biggest concern is that there is an indisputable connection between vaccines and children with autism. We have seen the more children are vaccinated the more cases of autism are recorded. Again, this is something the FDA is supposed to watch out for to protect the American people. “We have a fairly large practice. We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines,” said Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, Homefirst’s medical director who founded the practice in 1973. Homefirst doctors have delivered more than 15,000 babies at home, and thousands of them have never been vaccinated.

The few autistic children Homefirst sees were vaccinated before their families became patients, Eisenstein said. “I can think of two or three autistic children who we’ve delivered their mother’s next baby, and we aren’t really totally taking care of that child — they have special care needs. But they bring the younger children to us. I don’t have a single case that I can think of that wasn’t vaccinated.”

The autism rate in Illinois public schools is 38 per 10,000, according to state Education Department data; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention puts the national rate of autism spectrum disorders at 1 in 166 — 60 per 10,000.

“We do have enough of a sample,” Eisenstein said. “The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We’re all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there’s no communication. It’s frightening. You can’t touch them. It’s not something that anyone would miss.”

No one knows what causes autism, but federal health authorities say it isn’t childhood immunizations. Some parents and a small minority of doctors and scientists, however, assert vaccines are responsible.

One has to ask the question ‘Why is there a connection between autism and vaccines and why is it not being addressed?’ There is really only one logical conclusion, money. Big pharma makes billions off of vaccines. When I was a kid we were vaccinated for polio and a couple other things but there was never a reaction to the vaccines that we see today. Texas at one point required all girls to be vaccinated with gardisil against cervical cancer. The State legislature, after a major backlash from parents, ended up reversing this law even overriding the veto from then governor Rick Perry. These vaccines were given to girls as young as 11 even though it requires the sex act to become infected. Many parents were upset but Perry would not back down. Around the world reports of severe reactions to this vaccine were mounting but they were/are being ignored and almost never reported on by MSM. Are HPV vaccines the number one cause of coincidence around the globe? Are we facing one of the worst epidemics of mass hysteria the world has ever seen? Apparently, health authorities around the world would like us to believe one of these two scenarios.

Almost without exception, survivors of new medical conditions after the administration of Gardasil or Cervarix are told their problems are coincidental, psychosomatic, mass hysteria, conversion disorder, and so on…ad nauseam. The health authorities in one country (Colombia) even went so far as to attribute new medical conditions after Gardasil to the overuse of Ouija boards.

If all of the above fail, the next step is to try and blame the new symptoms on the parents with phrases like Munchausen by proxy, factitious disorder, fabricated or induced illness, attention seeking, simply out for money, and so on.

The first problem with all of these theories is they are usually put forth after little or no medical investigation. This leaves parents who believed their health authorities and had their daughters injected with the newest miracle vaccine feeling confused, abandoned and betrayed by the very people they trusted to protect their children’s health and well-being.

The second problem with all of these theories is they delay potentially life-saving treatments which could be provided if investigations took place, accurate diagnoses made and treatment protocols designed and implemented.

There have to be a reason why there is always a connection to vaccines when side effects, sometimes even death, are so common. As I stated before money is the main reason. We see this with GMO products and Monsanto. The former vice-president of Monsanto was put into a high position in the FDA by Obama: Was it a conflict of interest when former Monsanto Vice President Michael Taylor was named as the “Food Czar,” aka the Deputy Commissioner of Foods for then-new President Barack Obama’s FDA?

One thing’s for sure: it was an incredible betrayal to the millions of people who got behind Obama’s campaign in large part because he really seemed to “get it” like few other political candidates before him; as evidenced by his emphatic promise to label GMOs (that of course never came to fruition even though 90 percent-plus Americans routinely support mandatory labeling, a right afforded in over 60 countries across the world).

Now, after years of hand-wringing, frustration and anger from the general populace toward Taylor’s appointment, the “Monsanto Man” is finally set to step down, on (approximately) June 1 of this year according to a new article from the website Food & Water Watch.

“Our magnificently diverse food system is full of challenges and opportunities, and I plan to continue working toward its success, especially in settings where people lack regular accesses to sufficient, nutrition and safe food,” Taylor wrote in a letter to friends according to the article. “I suspect our paths will cross again.”

To the countless people who petitioned against the clear conflict of interest of hiring Taylor and other strongly pro-Monsanto people to be put in charge of the food system, his final comments sound like more of the same, like Taylor never quite got the message: “safe food” and “diverse food system” read like classic GM industry PR talking points. The U.S. food system remains heavily dominated by mostly genetically engineered commodity crops like corn and soy which are heavily subsidized by U.S. taxpayers.

It is not known whether Taylor will rejoin the government or FDA at some point but as the above article mentions he has strong ties to Monsanto.

The fact that the people who have helped engineer these divisive products have been put in charge of approving and dispersing these products reeks of scandal beyond anything we have yet seen in government. It has just begun to be exposed.

Part 3: Vaccines ~ Good or Bad?

Money seems to be the deciding factor in all of this. The fact that vaccines seem to help the globalist in their quest to reduce the population of the planet seems to move this along quite well. In medicine, the mark of corporate dominance is obvious in the drug commercials on TV and in the silencing of the voices of conscientious science-based drug and vaccine skeptics.

It has increasingly come to my attention that institutions such as the CDC, the FDA, the AMA, the AAP, the AAFP and even the prestigious Mayo Clinic (perhaps to keep competitive with other for-profit, corporate-influenced medical institutions) have begun taking money from corporations interested in selling their products and services at a high profit.

In the case of Big Medicine and Big Pharma, this money-influencing takes the form of pharmaceutical company-generated “unrestricted” grants, speaker’s bureau fees, advertising income in medical journals, funding for drug-related research and the granting of stock options for being helpful to the corporations. Those institutions, once supposedly non-profit institutions that were independent of outside corporate influences, now often act as spokespersons for the multinational pharmaceutical and vaccine industries.

To their shame, these organizations often act like Big Pharma lobbyists and often ignore (and even suppress) a lot of the new evidence-based medical research data that may contradict the established, sometimes out-of-date medical dogmas that most well-off establishment groups adhere to. Ignoring or repressing new research and ostracizing conscientious researchers is bad medicine and bad science. 1 If you’re old enough to remember the swine flu ‘epedemic’ during the Ford presidency you’ll remember that the government warned all America to get the vaccine, many did but the only person that died was one that got vaccinated. Personally I haven’t had any vaccines since I was a kid. I won’t get the annual flu shot that most people get and I haven’t had the flu in over 30 years.

There is no guarantee of vaccine efficiency and way too many risks involved. Just two years after Gardisil’s introduction into the US, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported the following HPV vaccine-related problems, including 32 deaths (that were more or less equally distributed following either the first, second or third inoculation). The median interval from vaccination to death was 14.5 days.

HPV vaccine-related problems that were reported on the VAERS site included autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, lymphadenopathy, pulmonary embolus, nausea, pancreatitis, vomiting, asthenia (weakness), chills, death, chronic fatigue, malaise, autoimmune diseases, hypersensitivity reactions (including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria), arthralgia, myalgia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, dizziness, Guillain-Barré syndrome, headache, motor neuron disease, paralysis, seizures, syncope (sometimes resulting in falling with injury), transverse myelitis, and deep venous thrombosis.

But contrast what Mayo Clinic’s 2016 website says about adverse reactions to HPV vaccines: “may cause soreness at the injection site (the arm), headaches and low-grade fever. Sometimes dizziness or fainting occurs after the injection… Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent HPV vaccine) might also cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain.”

For some reason (corporate interests being served?), Mayo’s website fails to mention ANY of the serious adverse effects that were reported on VAERS.

It is obvious that even the Mayo Clinc is subject to corporate corruption. There is even more evidence that this vaccine is more dangerous than they are letting us know: As of January 2015 VAERS revealed that there had been 220 reported HPV vaccine-related deaths, 1,283 reported disabled patients, 3,945 reported hospital admissions, 12,305 reported admissions to an emergency room, 595 reported abnormal Pap smears, 262 reported cases of cervical dysplasia and 100 reported cases of cervical cancer! It is important to mention that the FDA admits that as few as 1% of adverse reactions to drugs or vaccines are ever reported by patients or physicians, so these numbers are likely to be falsely low. In other words, the real number of adverse events related to HPV could be as much as 100 times higher than the reported 38,217!

Despite their “confidence” in the efficacy of the vaccine, Merck and Glaxo still advise that inoculated patients follow the same schedule of regular Pap smears that unvaccinated women are advised to follow. In other word, there is no guarantee the shots will work.

These figures don’t tell us how many girls were issued the vaccine but these numbers are outrageous! It seems that no matter how dangerous the so-called medication is as long as the side effects are mentioned it’s OK to issue them and even mandate them. Next time there is a commercial on television about a medication listen to the possible side effects. In all too many cases the side effects are worse than the problem it is supposed to treat!

Sometimes we see geographical areas that seem to produce very bad results. It is probably more of a very defective/contaminated vaccine batch than anything else but it is still something that we must, as parents, take into consideration when ‘authorities’ tell us we need to vaccinate our kids. Any time we hear of children getting sick from a disease in which someone along the transmission chain was not vaccinated, we are treated to a flurry of invective about “science-deniers” who endanger everyone because they don’t vaccinate their children.

The fact that these vaccinations themselves might be responsible for the contagion in the first place is ignored.

But how often does getting sick from one of these diseases that allegedly pass through an unvaccinated child actually produce a fatality? I haven’t heard of one in many years.

Yet vaccines have produced fatalities. In fact, an entire group of people were sickened and two died in Mexico recently.

According to Fox News Latino: “2 Babies die, 37 others sickened by vaccines in southern Mexico.”

Two babies from rural communities died and 37 others were hospitalized in the southern state of Chiapas after having an allergic reaction to vaccinations administered by Mexican Social Security Institute, or IMSS, personnel, state officials said.

The Chiapas Health Secretariat is treating 37 children in the town of La Pimienta, outside the city of Simojovel, after they experienced allergic reactions to a vaccine supposedly administered by IMSS health personnel,” state health officials said.

A total of “14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition,” the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement.

Two children age 1 died,” the secretariat said.

That sounds like a significant number. Why would they all be clustered around a single area?

If you read to the end of the article you learn some more numbers:

A total of 52 children received the BCG (tuberculosis), rotavirus and hepatitis B vaccines at the hospital in Simojovel as part of the National Vaccination Program, the IMSS said.

Both the Chiapas Health Secretariat and the IMSS are conducting investigations to identify the cause of the allergic reactions that the babies experienced.

The National Human Rights Commission, or CNDH, also said in a statement released Saturday that it was opening an investigation to determine what caused the babies’ deaths.

Until the investigations are completed, administration of these vaccines has been suspended at the national level as a preventative measure,” the IMSS said. EFE.

This is a 75% failure rate! I can assure you it wasn’t the fault of the patients. It’s the fault of the vaccine. It is a major problem because the government allows the pharmacutical companies immunity in most cases. This will be discussed later in this series. Be prepared for an onslught of demand for even adults to get vaccines in some cases just to get a job. 1984 isn’t coming, it’s here.

Part 4: Vaccines ~ Good or Bad?

I believe that at one time when vaccines first came on the scene they actually did some good but money, greed, outright demand for control over the people and the UN’s obsession with population control has taken this beyond the pale in terms of moral standards. So many of us, and I was one of them, that believed whatever the government said. I was also a Democrat at the time so that explains the mindless following of the nanny state. But I finally woke up in the late 1970’s, thanks to Jimmy Carter’s presidency, and began to realize that the government was not out for the people but for the government. Democrats still drink the kool aid but I have learned to not trust anything the government says. In the 1930’s they were saying we were headed for a mini ice age and in the 1980’s they said we were headed for melting ice caps, shore lines disappearing, cities being flooded, and the planet frying in unheard of heat. Well, neither happened except New Orleans flooded but that wasn’t because of melting ice caps. It was because idiots built a city below sea level in a hurricane zone and the obvious happened.

Today’s CDC doesn’t seem to want to give us real information, surprise, surprise, on the positive effects of vaccinations, if there are any. But studies for the very early days are available when people still acted with character. Before the inception of the CDC in 1946. And they discover the first study by Alfred Wallace published in 1889 between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals for the first Small-pox vaccine entitled, Vaccination: Proved Useless & Dangerous.

The study’s conclusions based on forty-five years of registration statistics concluded the following (p 4):

* That during the forty-five years of the Registration of deaths and their causes, Small-pox mortality has very slightly diminished, while an exceedingly severe Small-pox epidemic occurred within the last twelve years of the period.

* That there is no evidence to show that the slight decrease of Small-pox mortality is due to vaccination.

* That the severity of Small-pox as a disease has not been mitigated by vaccination.

* That several inoculable diseases have increased to an alarming extent coincidently with enforced vaccination.

The first two claims were proved from the Registrar General’s Reports from 1838 to 1882. The results were indisputable, presented in figures and graphs for the entire period, so that data could not be manipulated.

The author noted that during this time period, a decline in deaths from Diarrhea and Typhus was six times greater than the decline in deaths from Small-pox due “to more efficient sanitation, greater personal attention to the law of health, and probably also to more rational methods of treatment.”

Keep in mind that these reports are from a long time ago but there was moral standards then that we very rarely see today. If something didn’t work or was a detriment to mankind it was brought to the attention of the public. Today our FDA and EPA are worthless at what they were established to do. The EPA allows glyphosate to be genetically engineered into our food and then even sprayed onto our food and neither the EPA nor the FDA will enforce the informing of it to the public! They even accept fake science tests that state that it is safe.

Studies done by countries in Europe discover some very disturbing things in the vaccines that are available today. Researchers examining 44 samples of 30 different vaccines found dangerous contaminants, including red blood cells in one vaccine and metal toxicants in every single sample tested – except in one animal vaccine.

Using extremely sensitive new technologies not used in vaccine manufacturing, Italian scientists reported they were “baffled” by their discoveries which included single particles and aggregates of organic debris including red cells of human or possibly animal origin and metals including lead, tungsten, gold, and chromium, that have been linked to autoimmune disease and leukemia.

In the study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antoinetta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.

Lead particles were found in the cervical cancer vaccines, Gardasil and Cevarix, for example, and in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal manufactured by Novartis as well as in the Meningetec vaccine meant to protect against meningitis C.

Samples of an infant vaccine called Infarix Hexa (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenzae type B) manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline was found to contain stainless steel, tungsten and a gold-zinc aggregate.

Other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was identified in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France that were tested.

GSK’s Fluarix vaccine for children three years and older contained 11 metals and aggregates of metals. Similar aggregates to those identified in the vaccines have been shown to be prevalent in cases of leukemia, the researchers noted. What is disgusting is in America this valuable information is kept from the public and is basically ignored by the AMA.

Aluminum has been linked to Alzheimer’s but we don’t seem to want to give up our aluminum pans, aluminum foil, aluminum pop and beer cans and a ton of other things. The Age of Aluminum, reveals the “dark side” of this toxic metal, exploring the scientific links between aluminum and diseases such as breast cancer and neurological disorders. Also exposed is how aluminum mining and manufacturing have created acute ecological problems across the globe, leading to environmental disasters in Hungary, South Africa, and the UK. In the film, neuroscientist Christopher Shaw reports:

Many researchers are beginning to accept that aluminum has some sort of role to play in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s. Whether it does in others is still an open question, but Alzheimer’s is really coming into focus and it’s fairly clear that the body burden of aluminum from all the sources to which humans are exposed may be contributing to Alzheimer’s disease.”

Aluminum Is Everywhere
Although aluminum occurs naturally in soil, water, and air, we are contributing to the load with the mining and processing of aluminum ores, manufacturing of aluminum products, and the operation of coal-fired power plants and incinerators. Aluminum can’t be destroyed in the environment—it only changes its form by attaching or separating from other particles.

Rain washes aluminum particles out of the air and into our water supply, where they tend to accumulate rather than degrade. If you live in an industrial area, your exposure is undoubtedly higher than average.

According to CDC, the average adult in the US consumes about seven to nine mg of aluminum per day in food, and a lesser amount from air and water. Only about one percent of the aluminum you ingest orally gets absorbed into your body—the rest is moved out by your digestive tract, provided it’s functioning well.

When tested in a lab, aluminum contamination has been found in a vast number of products on the market, from foods and beverages to pharmaceuticals, which suggests the manufacturing process itself is a significant part of the problem. Aluminum is found in a shocking number of foods and consumer products, including:

* Foods such as baking powder, self rising flour, salt, baby formula, coffee creamers, baked goods and processed foods, coloring and caking agents

* Drugs, such as antacids, analgesics, anti-diarrheals, and others; additives such as magnesium stearate

* Vaccines—Hepatitis A and B, Hib, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), pneumococcal vaccine, Gardasil (HPV), and others

* Cosmetics and personal care products such as antiperspirants, deodorants (including salt crystals, made of alum), lotions, sunscreens, and shampoos

* Aluminum products, including foil, cans, juice pouches, tins, and water bottles.

This doesn’t even account for the aluminum and other toxic metals that they are releasing into our atmosphere in the chemtrails that we see in the sky everyday and have been seeing since the 1950’s. We have to pay attention because our government is no longer doing its job. We have to research these things or at least find reliable sources on these subjects.

Written by Roger Anghis and published by iPatriot as a four-part series from June 25 through July 23, 2017.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *